The recent Coldplay incident has sparked conversation about workplace romance and employee rights in Florida and elsewhere. At a July 2025 Coldplay concert, the kiss cam showed Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and the company’s Chief People Officer, Kristin Cabot, embracing on the big screen. The viral moment quickly led to their suspension and eventual resignations, fueling debate about whether immediate termination is the right response to a workplace romance.
In Florida, employers often struggle with these situations. Relationships vary in seriousness, and not every scenario justifies firing an employee on the spot. Employees deserve fair treatment, and employers benefit from policies that balance professionalism with respect for personal lives.
At the Law Offices of Gary A. Costales, P.A., we bring decades of board-certified experience in employment law to sensitive workplace matters. Our background in handling discrimination, retaliation, and contract issues provides credibility and authority when advising on workplace romance policies. We help employers and employees navigate these challenges with integrity and skill.
Florida is an at-will employment state, so employers can typically fire employees for any lawful reason, which can include romances when company policy prohibits them. However, workers can’t be fired for unlawful reasons, like discrimination or retaliation.
If discipline in the context of a romance is applied inconsistently or unfairly, employees might have a claim. Employers should weigh whether a blanket ban is in their business’s interest or if a more nuanced set of guidelines is a better solution.
Instant dismissal for romantic involvement frequently misses the nuances. Employers would be well-advised to consider these questions before taking action:
Immediate termination could:
Evaluating the seriousness of the relationship and potential conflicts of interest usually provides a more equitable and balanced outcome.
Workplace romances can be governed through organizational policies. These can set standards and expectations instead of “punishing” those involved without communicating the problem and solution to all employees. Standards could include:
For unavoidable relationships that do form, dealing with them confidentially and respectfully can engender trust. Open discussion is better than a zero-tolerance policy that would only escalate interpersonal conflict.
Disclosures by employees of workplace relationships are also necessary when potential conflicts of interest might occur. When managed well, the risk of workplace relationships can be mitigated without creating an overly antagonistic work environment.
One practical way to handle workplace relationships is through “romantic contracts,” sometimes called consensual relationship agreements. These documents:
By creating clear boundaries, employers reduce liability while respecting employee autonomy. Romantic contracts can serve as a middle ground, allowing relationships to continue while protecting both the company and the individuals involved from misunderstandings or potential disputes in the future.
Yes, employers can implement strict no-dating policies, but enforcement can be difficult. Florida law does not prohibit such relationships; however, employers are free to regulate them to the extent they do not discriminate in an unlawful manner.
A blanket prohibition may also create morale or underground relationship problems. Most companies permit such relationships with certain safeguards in place, such as disclosure when conflicts of interest may occur.
In a 2023 Society for Human Resource Management survey, 27% of U.S. employees said they’ve had or currently do have a workplace romance. That’s why it’s important for employers to have well-considered policies on the subject. Rather than lashing out against employees involved in a relationship, it’s helpful to remember how common they are. Instead, businesses can focus on managing them in ways that prevent conflicts of interest or concerns about harassment.
In Florida, employers generally may terminate employees for off-duty conduct under the at-will doctrine unless the conduct is legally protected, such as political activity, whistleblowing, or taking protected leave. The way it is applied must be nondiscriminatory. An employer may not single out one employee for conduct in public when the employer does not punish another employee who has engaged in the same behavior.
Employees can safeguard themselves by being forthcoming if company policies call for it. They can also make sure to keep personal and professional boundaries clearly defined. Staying professional at work, avoiding favoritism, and having any agreements made in writing are all key. In some cases, signing a consensual relationship agreement can establish clear boundaries.
Yes, workplace romance policies generally apply to remote employees as well as those in the office. Employees working from home can still closely cooperate with one another, become personal confidants, or engage in conflicts of interest.
Employers should make sure employees understand that their disclosure and conduct rules still apply when working in a remote or hybrid environment. Applying these rules fairly can mitigate liability and maintain consistent expectations, regardless of work location.
The Coldplay incident shows how quickly workplace romances can create complex legal and professional consequences. Terminating an employee on the spot may not always be the most prudent or equitable course of action. Sound policies, effective communication, and other measures, including romantic contracts, can protect employees and employers from unfair treatment and minimize exposure.
At the Law Offices of Gary A. Costales, P.A., we help clients navigate these matters with fairness in mind while effectively mitigating risk. Please contact us today to find out more about your workplace rights and obligations.
© 2025 Law Offices of Gary A. Costales, P.A.. All Rights reserved Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Digital Marketing By: 